Publications

Security Competition and Denuclearization: The North Korean Nuclear Crisis and International Strategic Choices

Publication Categories: 

Differing approaches by key stakeholders to the North Korean nuclear issue is a

manifestation of the security competition among some of them, especially the two

Koreas, the United States, and China. These major players have competing visions of

national security objectives and priorities, including regional peace, regime stability,

alliance relationship, security assurance, and denuclearization. Some objectives are

overlapping, while others might be conflicting. For some countries, the pursuit of

Policy Memo for “Security Competition and Denuclearization: The North Korean Nuclear Crisis and International Strategic Choices”

Publication Categories: 

The North Korean Nuclear Crisis is a manifestation of the security competition among

the key stakeholders, especially the two Koreas, the United States and China. In this

paper, I argue that the competing vision of national security interests/objectives and

the existence of “security competition” by major players in Northeast Asia under the

particular international structure provide both constraints and opportunities for the

formation of this re-emerged stalemate and the potential resolution of the nuclear

CREATING A CONSTITUENCY FOR UNILATERAL NUCLEAR RESTRAINT IN PAKISTAN: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES

Publication Categories: 

The last few years have revealed an increasing trend of ‘vertical proliferation’ in the South Asian

region. Recent revelations about quantitative and qualitative developments in the nuclear and

missile inventories of India and Pakistan indicate a higher likelihood of an impending nuclear

arms competition in the region. If the disintegration of the Soviet Union set any precedent, it

suggests that an arms race would be to the detriment of Pakistan’s national security. First,

Sharing the Bomb: Nonproliferation, Deterrence, and Foreign Nuclear Deployments

Publication Categories: 

When the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan in August 1945, it

launched a grand contest between two forces: nations determined to prevent the spread of

nuclear weapons, and those determined to acquire their own. Early hopes of a long-
lasting American atomic monopoly were dashed by the Soviet Union’s first atomic test in

1949, followed by Great Britain in 1952, France in 1960, and China in 1964. Three more

nations (Israel, India, and South Africa) successfully crossed the nuclear threshold by

Low Numbers and the Role of Verification

Publication Categories: 

Arms control treaties deal with sensitive issue of national security. States that come to an

agreement through a compromise balancing their interests want to make sure that the other

party is fulfilling its obligations and that fulfilling your own obligations does not put you at a

relative disadvantage. That is why arms control agreements are rarely self-executing. Even

though it is generally believed that states enter international treaties in good faith and are

Re-imagining global nuclear ordering beyond proliferation and deterrence

Publication Categories: 

This article analyzes nuclear weapons related scholarship as a subset of security studies

particularly prone to self-censorship, even in the post-Cold War era. It argues that self-
censorship effects come from the joint use of the notions of deterrence and non-proliferation

and the invocation of an expected veto player. The effects of the words 'proliferation' and

'deterrence' and the assumption that a supposedly important player in nuclear policy will veto

proposals for change, create avenues for self-censorship and delegitimize transformative

Re-imagining global nuclear ordering beyond proliferation and deterrence: Implication for progressive nuclear weapons policy

Publication Categories: 

The importance of arms control and of the goal of strategic stability in the US nuclear

weapons policy toolkit since the 1970s suggest that it is a fundamentally conservative realm of

policymaking and that this conservative aspect might be good news as, in the nuclear realm

maybe more than anywhere else. However, in nuclear weapons policy as in other areas,

decision-making cannot be oriented towards pure stasis. This is why the study of the conditions

of possibility of progressive nuclear weapons policy is crucial.

Moscow’s emerging electronic warfare capabilities: a dangerous jammer on U.S./NATO-Russian relations?

Publication Categories: 

Ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have given Russia an opportunity to

test the employment of electronic warfare (EW) capabilities that Moscow has developed

over the last decade in order to deter and counter military threats from the West.2 To be

sure, Western analysts have foreseen the emergence of Russia’s anti-access/area denial

capabilities, including advanced electronic counter measures (ECM), for over a decade.3

What arguably came as a surprise is the demonstrative nature of Russia’s use of these

Moscow’s emerging electronic warfare capabilities: a dangerous jammer on U.S./NATO-Russian relations?

Publication Categories: 

Ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have given Russia an opportunity to

test the employment of electronic warfare (EW) capabilities that it has developed over

the last decade in order to deter and counter military threats from the West. News

reports suggest that pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine have utilized Russian systems

and concepts for electronic warfare in their operations against Ukrainian government

forces.2 In that conflict, jamming technologies have hindered the operations of

Pages